The fingerprint reader is a feature that is becoming increasingly common in smartphones top of the line, and begins to appear in some intermediaries, such as the Moto G4 Plus. A lot of people may not believe it, but there is a difference in the sensor of each unit, and some unlock the screen faster than others, even if almost imperceptibly.
this Is exactly what happens in this comparison between the iPhone 7 Plus and the Galaxy Note 7. Yes, as the "SuperSaf" speech in the video, a lot of people will complain and flounce, there is no difference, that unlock by digital is the same for all devices. Good, but it never hurts to try and see the result, right?
Before we go to the test, let’s go over the differences between the two devices. The iPhone 7 Plus has screen 5.5 inch resolution 1080 x 1920 pixels with density of 401ppi, Apple’s A10 Fusion Quad-core and 3GB of RAM. Your competitor in this field comes with 5.7-inch screen resolution 1440 x 2560 and pixel density of 534ppi, processor Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 Quad-core and 4GB of RAM.
as A curiosity, we have already shown in the TudoCelular some comparison between the two devices. We have tests of strength (1, 2) and comparison of the camera. So, given those other tests, we will compare the speed of unlocking the screen by the reading of fingerprints.
As was to be expected, to the naked eye, the difference can hardly be perceived. But do not worry, the video shows the unlock with 20% reduction in speed, which is more than enough to notice which of the two devices to unlock the screen more quickly.
he Was surprised? As it is, the Note 7 manages to unlock total in some thousandths of a second faster that the iPhone 7 Plus. And this is not the case of turning off animations: with them off, you can see that the phablet from the Samsung wins by a little bit of the version top of the Apple.
of Course, this should not be a reason for someone to choose between an appliance or other time to buy a new smartphone, there are many other more important issues. Even more considering the difference is so small, that can only be seen on a video with speed reduced to 20%.
No comments:
Post a Comment