Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Unfair? Video shows iPhone 6s razing Note 7 in test … – Tecmundo

Whenever a new top of the line device from Apple or Samsung is released, both companies are keen to show how their toys are superior to the competition – and each other, of course. The dispute between the brands, however, is not nearly the conflicts by his most loyal fans, who do everything to prove that they are the “right side” of the war. The most recent case in this category puts the iPhone 6s to face the Galaxy Note 7 in a battery of performance tests. Guess who wins the duel?

A video published by PhoneBuff channel on Friday (20) proposes exactly the place to test the firepower promised by the South Korean manufacturer to the successor of Note 5 – which has worldwide release scheduled for early September. As the latest model of Apple Company was responsible for debunking the previous edition of the Asian phablet in some of the major market benchmarks, responsible for the page on YouTube decided to check if the device keep his reign until the arrival of his replacement.

the dispute between these two beauties will always be controversy

Using its own methodology and not based only on synthetic tests, the idea of ​​youtuber was engage separate recordings with each of smartphones, making both opened a predefined sequence of applications and realizassem some tasks that require different types of processing hardware. At the end of the first round, all the app is accessed again to assess how the equipment deal with background programs and what the speed with which they are reopened by the system.

For comparison , actions, and images of each device were timed and placed side by side, allowing the performance of both can be measured in real time. The result of the game was that, as the pair has remained fairly team to run the simplest applications – such as camera, gallery and settings menu – it was enough that the games load games came on the scene for the iPhone 6s opened an advantage monstrous ahead of its competitor.

from there was no going back to the gadget from Samsung, who stayed behind while the Apple device opened high-resolution images, renderizava timelapses and accessed pages content services such as ESPN, Netflix, and Amazon Spotift and departure for the second phase of the test. In the end, the iPhone 6s completed the challenge with partial 1m21s and 1m51s in as the Galaxy Note 7 noted, respectively, 2m05s and 2m50s in two stages. In total, Apple completed everything about 1m30s faster than the South Korean launch.

Quiet! The tip is that Apple fans hold a little desire to gloat and Samsung’s followers spare the keyboard instead of preparing THAT textão that bounces off every second of the contest video. This is because it is clear that the way the test was carried out does not take into account important differences between the devices. The resolution of both devices display, for example, may have considerably influenced the start of the games. – Which was the point of greatest discrepancy

While the Note 7 need to open games in a Quad HD ( 2560×1440 pixels), the iPhone 6s need only be concerned with 1334×750 pixel rendering at the time of gambling. The way the own operating system work with the hardware available also influences the outcome. The CPU A9 dual-core processor and 2 GB of RAM seem to be mobile enough to iOS 9.3.4 running smooth, while the Snapdragon 820 and 4GB of RAM Galaxy need to deal with the scope of the Android 6.0 .1.

the way the test was carried out does not take into account important differences between devices

Some netizens also raised the fact that the youtuber did not include a copy with the Exynos processor – designed by Samsung itself – which, theoretically, is more efficient than the solution from Qualcomm. Anyway, even with all its flaws methodology, the test gives a fair sample of how Tim Cook and his team seem to really hit the development of the iPhone 6s. The problem is: will the iPhone 7 will bring enough innovation to overcome a device that holds very well today

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment