The Samsung yesterday launched pre-sales of the Galaxy Note 7 on Brazilian soil, just that interested disburse the amount of R $ 4,299 to guarantee your copy before the start conventional sales. Now, an interesting test with the new phablet bearer of the S Pen has been published by the renowned portal GSM Arena , putting it side by side with its predecessor Galaxy Note 5 and also with the recent flagship Galaxy S7 Edge, which shares many of its technical specifications.
As the title already delivery, the test is designed for those who want the photographic potential of the new device and compare it to what is achieved by other models of Samsung, so that It can be heavy if it really pay the extra amount charged by the Galaxy Note 7 or whether it is more feasible to bet on any of the devices released in previous months. Before going to the images themselves, however, it is necessary we take some points into consideration.
The first is that the Galaxy Note 5 has the highest resolution of the three models, with 16 megapixels to 12 megapixels of others. In addition, he is the only one who can capture images with a 16: 9 at its maximum resolution, since the other two reach only 4: 3. On the other hand, we have a larger opening in 2016 smartphones, as well as a larger and larger pixels sensor, ensuring superior performance in low light environments.
The table with the main specifications of the three devices can be found below:
| Galaxy Note 5 | Galaxy S7 Edge | Galaxy Note 7 | |
| Maximum resolution | 16 MP 5312 x 2988 pixels 16: 9 | 12 MP 4032 x 3024 pixels 4: 3 | 12 MP 4032 x 3024 pixels 4: 3 |
| Sensor Size | 1 / 2.6 “ | 1 / 2.5 “ | 1 / 2.5 “ |
| pixel size | 1.12 uM | 1.4 uM | 1.4 uM |
| Sensor Model | Sony IMX240 | Sony IMX260 | Sony IMX260 |
| Focal length | 28mm | 26mm | 26mm |
| Open | f / 1.9 | f / 1.7 | f / 1.7 |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical | Optical |
| Focus | PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Flash | LED | LED | LED |
| Video | 2160p @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps, 1080p @ 30fps | 2160p @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps, 1080p @ 30fps | 2160p @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps, 1080p @ 30fps |
| Front camera | 5 MP, f / 1.9, 22mm, Auto HDR, Panorama 1440p @ 30fps | 5 MP, f / 1.7, 22mm, Auto HDR, Panorama 1440p @ 30fps | 5 MP, f / 1.7, 22mm, Auto HDR, Panorama 1440p @ 30fps |
As we are talking about smartphones with a different ratio on the captured images with maximum resolution, it is necessary take into account that the field of view will vary, found a more open image on the Galaxy Note 5 while the other two show something more closed. This accounts for some differences in the direct comparison between the images being shown just below a good example of how this factor affects what you see in the final picture:
All images can be seen in the extensive gallery below. In them, we can see that Galaxy Note and Galaxy 7 S7 Edge have very similar images in sunny environments, which was to be expected considering the set used in both cameras. On the other hand, the optimization software made by Samsung with its automatic HDR mode really makes a difference, making environments with high contrast much better defined in the new phablet bearer of the S Pen. It is worth noting, however, that the S7 Edge apparently fared a little better when using the LED flash, with less blown colors.
It is believed that the Galaxy Note 7 deserves the title of this comparison? What did you think of his difference pros other models? Give us your comment below! For those on your smartphone, the sequence of photos is always Galaxy Note 5, Galaxy S7 Edge and Galaxy Note 7, respectively.
sunny External Environment # 1
sunny external Environment # 2
sunny external Environment # 3
sunny external Environment # 4
sunny internal environment
Environment with high contrast (off HDR)
Environment with high contrast (auto HDR)
Environment with high contrast (on HDR)
Twilight
internal environment with high contrast (off HDR)
internal environment with high contrast (on HDR)
night external Environment
night external environment with flash # 1
Outdoors night with flash # 2
Macro
selfie # 1
selfie # 2
selfie # 3
(updated 23 August 2016 at 19:32)
No comments:
Post a Comment